Blog : generation Z

AW16: JUMPING ON THE DIGITAL BANDWAGON

AW16: JUMPING ON THE DIGITAL BANDWAGON

LFW2-Article ImageAmidst the topical ‘broken fashion system’ debate flooding trade news since the end of last year, it appears that the fashion industry is now undergoing a major shift to meet the demands of the digital age – or more specifically: generation Z. Fashion brands are currently trying to work out where they fit into this digital world and how they can meet the expectations of the modern consumer in order to stay relevant (Final Fantasy x Louis Vuitton Spring / Summer ’16 anyone?). During a time where technological advancements are allowing us to download, live stream, and process information as-it-happens, how are fashion brands responding to a world that simply wants everything now?

As Kirsty recently discussed on the blog, Burberry has been quick to jump on the digital bandwagon as a way to raise its profile and introduce the heritage brand to a wider, younger and social media-savvy audience.  But Burberry hasn’t stopped there: the British label’s creative director, Christopher Bailey, has most recently announced it’s plans to make all collections immediately available for purchase online and in-store from September, with shop window displays and media campaigns changing the moment the show is finished. Following the news, Tom Ford, Tommy Hilfiger, Proenza Schouler and Rebecca Minkoff have all been quick to reveal plans for a similar shift into direct-to-consumer shows.

LFW1-Article Image

If this ‘see-now-buy-now’ experiment wasn’t enough to satisfy consumers, fashion brands worldwide, including Burberry and Tom Ford, have said they will start showing seasonless men and women’s ready-to-wear collections together on the catwalk, twice a year.  This new strategy takes place not only to take some pressure off the business, but also as a result of new digital trends evolving around gender fluidity. Paul Smith and Vetements have also confirmed they will begin showing their collections in this format.

The purpose of fashion shows and presentations used to be so that designers could show their collections to the industry’s journalists and buyers – in the hope of good press and placed orders – and were (and still claim to be) trade-only events. But since the introduction and popularity of live streaming, social media, mobile apps, street style, and blogging welcomed a completely new and commercial way to consume fashion, the fashion world has gradually allowed itself to become more widely and instantly accessible to its consumer.  Having gradually moved to a more consumer-led approach, the industry now finds itself in a position where it is no longer deemed reasonable for its consumers to preview collections seasons in advance, and then have to wait six months for said collection to be available for purchase.

The British fashion industry is contributing upwards of £26 billion to the UK’s economy alone, yet we still seem to be looking at an industry that is so desperately looking at ways in which it can realign itself with the digital communication cycle. I don’t know about you, but if technological advancements and consumer acknowledgement are pushing brands to change the face of fashion as we know it, be that moving the focus from trade to consumer, then Autumn / Winter 2016 has already established itself as a season like no other. Watch this space.

Ahead of the curve: the Kardashians leading the way?

Ahead of the curve: the Kardashians leading the way?

Kim K and the rest of the clan have been busy this past week, all launching their own personal paid-for apps and websites. So is this a sign of things to come? Will we all be forced to pay to see content published by our favourite celebs, and eventually vloggers and bloggers?

Most importantly, will you be paying the Kardashians your hard earned cash monies for a sneak peek into their world?

Admittedly I am biased on this subject. I look upon them as my extended family (my name starts with a K after all and I do spend every Sunday evening with them thanks to E!) so it is more than likely I will pay for access to their ‘exclusive’ content’ and show favour to at least one of them. But what about the rest of the world?

According to TMZ, they are jumping on board with a staggering 891,340 signing up to the four sites in the first 24 hours of launching, despite their paywall of $2.99 (roughly £1.87) a month. 74% of those were for Kylie, 10.8% for Khloe, 9% for Kim and 5% for Kendall (Kourtney’s has yet to be unveiled).

This isn’t the first time we are seeing online content sneak its way into our purse/wallet. The Sun operates on this system, as does The Guardian and The Times, but the Kardashians? Surely one would be forgiven for thinking it is ludicrous to expect your average, everyday follower to start paying to see what they get up to.

Wrong. Welcome to the era of Generation Z my friends. Sit back and watch as they prepare for world domination. For you wouldn’t complain about buying your paper in the morning, so as we move steadily towards a world of instantaneous content online, why should this be any different?

It may also prove a useful tool for brands in the long run as they look to direct their focus on specific target audiences through these platforms, such as a 23 year-old comms professional, interested in hearing the latest fashion and lifestyle tips from her favourite reality TV family…

Love them or hate them, the Kardashians are ahead of the curve in my opinion. They are setting a trend that I fully expect to see our most popular bloggers and vloggers embrace over the next few years. For we live in a world where nothing comes free, unfortunately.

Now, who else thinks Kara Kardashian has a nice ring to it…